Energy Trajectory Efficiency In Europe And Eurasia A Dynamic Panel Data Models Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
World energy consumption alludes to the aggregate energy utilized by all of
human civilization. As per the International Energy Agency (IEA), the worldwide
energy consumption has been becoming relentlessly finished the last decade; where it
constitutes one of the main parts with the quickest developing on the planet. This
investigation examinations the connection between global energy consumption and
diverse perspectives. The outcomes demonstrate a noteworthy way, which is a cointegrating
connection between energy consumption and the variables package. The
outcomes likewise show bidirectional, unidirectional and neutral causality between
energy consumption and a few factors, which could be a decent tool to prioritize the
allocation of assets crosswise over businesses to guarantee a superior fiery strategy by
and large and monetary results.
Article Details
References
Akarca, A.T., Long, T.V., 1980. On the relationship between energy and GNP: a
re-examination. Journal of Energy and Development 5 (2), 326–331.
Alam, M. J., Begum, I. A., Buysse, J., Rahman, S., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2011).
Dynamic modeling of causal relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions
and economic growth in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6),
–3251. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.029
Baltagi, B. (1998). Panel Data Methods. Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics,
(409), 291–324.
Bigano, A., Bosello, F. & Marano, G. (2006), Energy demand and temperature : A
dynamic panel analysis., working paper 112, FEEM.
Breitung, J., 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances
in Econometrics 15, 161–177.
Chiou-Wei, S., Chen, C.-F., Zhu, Z., 2008. Economic growth and energy
consumption revisited—evidence from linear and nonlinear Granger causality. Energy
Econ. 30 (6), 30633076.
Ciarreta, A. Zarraga ,2010. Economic growth-electricity consumption causality in
European countries: A dynamic panel data approach Energy Policy 38 , 3790–3796
Destais, G., Fouquau, J. & Hurlin, C. (2007b), Energy development and energy
intensity : A panel data analysis, in J. Keppler, R. Bourbonnais & J. Girod, eds, ‘The
Econometrics of Energy Systems’, Palgrave, chapter 5, pp. 98–120.
Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Cointegration and error correction:
representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251–276.
Ferguson, R., Wilkinson, W., Hill, R., 2000. Electricity use and economic
development. Energy Policy 28 (13), 923–934.
Fooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric
Ghouali.Y.Z., Belmokaddem.M., Sahraoui.M.A, Guellil.M.S., 2014. "Electricity
Consumption and Economic Growth: Test analysis using panel Co-integration", IJSE
“International Journal of Software Engineering”. Vol.1, July 30, 2014.
Ghouali.Y.Z., Belmokaddem.M., Sahraoui.M.A, Guellil.M.S., 2015. "Factors
Affecting CO2 Emissions in the BRICS Countries: A Panel Data Analysis". Procedia
Economics and Finance "Elsevier", 26, Pages 114–125. DOI: 10.1016/S22125671(15)00890-4.
Granger, C. W. J, “Investigating causal relations by econometric and cross-spectral
methods,”Econometrica, pp. 424–438, 1969
GUELLIL, M. S.,2016. « Modélisation Dynamique de la Trajectoire Energétique:
Analyse de la relation causale par le Recours à la Cointégration en Données de Panel »
(Doctoral thesis, University of Tlemcen, Tlemcen, ALGERIA). Retrieved from :
http://dspace.univ-tlemcen.dz/handle/112/8559
Hadri, K., 2000a. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel application.
Econometric Journal 3, 148–161.
Heidari, H., Turan Katircioğlu, S., & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic growth, CO2
emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. International Journal
of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64, 785–791.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.081
Ilhan Ozturk, Alper Aslan, Huseyin Kalyoncu “Energy consumption and economic
growth relationship: Evidence from panel data for low and middle income countries”
Energy Policy 38 (2010) 4422–4428
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y; (2003), Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous
panels. J Econometrics 115:53–74
K. Ali Akkemik, Koray Göksal; (2012). “Energy consumption-GDP nexus:
Heterogeneous panel causality analysis” Energy Economics 34 865–873
Kao, C., Chiang, M.-H., 2000. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated
regression in panel data. In: Baltagi, B.H. (Ed.), Advances in Econometrics:
Nonstationary Panels. Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15, pp. 179–222.
Kraft, J., Kraft, A., 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of
Energy and Development 3, 401–403.
Levin A, Lin CF, Lin ChuJ; (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and
finite-sample properties. J Econometrics 108:1–24
Maddala, G.S., Wu, S., 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data
and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 631–652 Special
Issue.
Mark, N.C., Sul, D., 2002. Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and
long-run money demand, NBER Technical Working Papers 0287, National Bureau of
Economic Research, Inc.
multipleregressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 653–678.
Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., Prasad, A., 2007. Electricity consumption in the G7
countries: a panel cointegration analysis of residential demand elasticities, EnergPolicy 35 (9), 4485–4494.
Ozturk, I., 2010. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus, Energ Policy 38 (1)340–349.
Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2
emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (grosdomestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India,
and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
Payne, J.E., 2010. Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship
between energy consumption and growth, J. Econ. Stud, 37 (1), 53–95.
Pedroni, P., 1997. Panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties ofpooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new resultsEconomics Working Paper, Indiana University.
Pedroni, P., 1999, Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels
with multiple regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 653–678.
Pedroni, P., 2000, Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels Adv.
Econ. 15, 93–130.
Pedroni, P., 2001, Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels, Rev. Econ.
Stat. 3 (A), 121 li.
Pedroni, P., 2004, Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of
fooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, Econometric Theory
, 597–625.
Pirlogea, C., Cicea, C., 2012, Econometric perspective of the energy consumption
and economic growth relation in European Union, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(8),
–5726.
Robin Coers, Mark Sanders; (2013). « The energy–GDP nexus; addressing an old
question with new methods”, Energy Economics 36, 708–715
Theodoros Zachariadis; (2007), « Exploring the relationship between energy use
and economic growth with bivariate models: Abstract New evidence from G-7
countries” Energy Economics 29 1233–1253
Westerlund, J., Narayan, P.K., 2012a, A random coefficients approach to the
predictability of stock returns in panels, Unpublished Manuscript.
Yu, E., Hwang, B., 1984, The relationship between energy and GNP. Further
results, Energy Economics 6, 186–190.
Tiwari, A. K; (2011), Comparative performance of renewable and nonrenewable
energy source on economic growth and CO2 emissions of Europe and Eurasian
countries: A PVAR approach, Economics Bulletin, 31(3), 2356-2372
Wooldridge, J. M; (2005), Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in
dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of applied
econometrics, 20(1), 39-54
JAFFE, Adam B. et PALMER, Karen. Environmental regulation and innovation: a
panel data study, Review of economics and statistics, 1997, vol. 79, no 4, p. 610-619
Ozturk, I., & Bilgili, F; (2015), Economic growth and biomass consumption nexus:
Dynamic panel analysis for Sub-Sahara African countries, Applied Energy, 137, 110116
Charnes,
A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E; (1981), Evaluating program and
managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow
through, Management science, 27(6), 668-697