Industrial Property Rights and the Phenomenon of Counterfeiting in Algeria: Case Study of Tlemcen and Oran

Main Article Content

Nawal Hirech

Abstract

The protection of industrial property rights is fundamental to economic growth in general, as it makes it possible to combat the counterfeiting that plagues a large number of economies throughout the world. The aim of this study is to ascertain the effectiveness of the Algerian industrial property rights protection system through a survey of entrepreneurs in the manufacturing sector in the Oran and Tlemcen regions. 


     This study provides an insight into the degree of satisfaction of entrepreneurs with this system, as well as identifying the reasons for the development of counterfeiting in Algeria in the manufacturing sector, which can ultimately be explained more by a lack of willingness to protect on the part of Algerian entrepreneurs than by the failure of the industrial property rights protection system.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hirech , N. (2023). Industrial Property Rights and the Phenomenon of Counterfeiting in Algeria: Case Study of Tlemcen and Oran. Finance and Business Economies Review, 7(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.58205/fber.v7i2.1730
Section
Articles

References

-Direction Générale des Douanes (2018). Définition légale de la contrefaçon. URL https://www.douane.gov.dz/IMG/pdf/contrefacon.pdf

-Doléac, H. (2019). La contrefaçon des Marques, Journée Nationale de Sensibilisation sur les Marques, Dessins et Modèles Industriels et Indications Géographiques, Inapi & WIPO, Alger 26 novembre 2019.

-Hoff, K., Stiglitz, J.E (2004). After the Big Bang? Obstacles to the Emergence of the Rule of Law in Post-Communist Societies, American Economic Review , 94(3), 753-763.

-ILO (1993). Statistiques de l'emploi dans le secteur informel, Rapport pour la 15ème Conférence Internationale des Statisticiens du Travail, Genève19-28 Janvier 1993.

-US Customs and Border protection (2020), Intellectual property rights seizures statistics, fiscal year 2020, No. 1542-0921

-Institut de Recherche en Propriété Intellectuelle Henri-Debois (2009). La propriété Intellectuelle en Algérie : une protection à l’épreuve de la Réalité, URL https://www.irpi.fr/upload/pdf/etudes_juri/09_algerie.pdf

-Nyström, K. (2008). The institutions of Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship : Evidence from Panel Data, Public Choice, 136(3/4), 269-282

-OECD (1998). The economic impact of counterfeiting, Paris, France.

-OECD& EUIPO (2016). Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact, OECD Publishing, Paris.

-OECD (2019). Trade in fake goods is now 3.3% of world trade and rising. URL. https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/trade-in-fake-goods-is-now-33-of-world-trade-and-rising.htm

-OMPI (2016). Comprendre la propriété. Publication OMPI N° 895F, Paris, France.

-Perret,C., Gharbi, N (2008). La contrefaçon en Algérie : risques et prise en compte par les entreprises. Une application aux produits cosmétiques, Cahiers du CREAD, 24(86), 59-80.

-Remiche B., Cassiers, V. (2009). Lutte anti-contrefaçon et transferts de technologies nord-sud : un véritable enjeu. Revue internationale de droit économique, 2009/3, 277- 324.

-Schumpeter, J (1914). History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press.

-WIPO (2010). Discussion paper on intellectual property (ip) and the informal economy. Sixth Session, Geneva, 22 – 26 november 2010

-WTO (2021). Intellectual property: protection and enforcement, URL https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm

https://www.elwatan.com/edition/actualite/les-marques-menacees-par-la-contrefacon-01-04-2018

http://www.radioalgerie.dz/news/fr/article/20190427/168157.html

https://setif.info/article1229.html

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.