Corporate Social Responsibility in Light of the Corona Pandemic: Experiences of leading international companies according to the Corporate Social Responsibility Magazine for the year 2021
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to identify the fact of the social responsibility of 6 companies, listed among the top 30 leading global companies according to the ranking of the Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2021, through their various activities, which contributed to the service of individuals and communities, and the reduction of environmental impacts and epidemics, such as the new Coronavirus pandemic (COCVID-19). One of the most important results from this study is the tendency of global companies to adopt social responsibility as an effective measure in the face of the negative effects of the Corona pandemic, although its deep consequences on these companies, governments, and societies all over the world. Based on that, this study recommended a set of suggestions, one of the most of them, is the requirement for national and Arab companies to focus on the priority of applying the dimensions of social responsibility because of its significant positive impact in overcoming the impact of the Corona pandemic; and developing businesses, economies, and societies.
Article Details
References
BLOWFIELD, M. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: reinventing the meaning of development? International Affairs, 81(3).
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4).
Carroll, A. B. (1991, July-August ). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibiiity: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons.
Carroll, A. B. (1999, septembre). Corporate Social Responsibility Evolution of a Definitional Construct. BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 38(3), 268-295.
David Crowther, Guler Aras. (2008). corporate social responsibility. ventus publishing Aps.
Hopkins, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: an issues paper . World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization
International Labour Office Geneva . Switzerland: International Labour Organization .
Hopkins, M. (2014, septembre). what is CSR all about. ASPIRARE, 1.
Jean-Yves Saulquin , Guillaume Schier. (2007). Responsabilité sociale des entreprises et performance: complémentarité ou substituabilité? La Revue des Sciences de Gestion.
Mauricio Andrés Latapí Agudelo , Lára Jóhannsdóttir and Brynhildur Davídsdóttir. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility.International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1).
Melé, D. (2009, septembre). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social ponsibility.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0003
Tschopp, D. J. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparison Between the United States and the European Union. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management(12), 55-59.
Wahiba Mokadem, Bishr Muhamed Muwafak. (2021). The Difference of the Theoretical Approach of Corporate Social Responsibility Between the European Union and the United States of America. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance (IJBEG), 4(1),124-136.
2019/2020 AT&T Corporate Responsibility Summary. (2021, october 20).
- 2020 Johnson & Johnson Annual Report. (2021, 11 09). Récupéré sur https://www.investor.jnj.com/annual-meeting-materials/2020-annual-report.
citizenship_report_2020_full.pdf. (2021, novembre 14). Récupéré sur https://us.pg.com/citizenship-report-2020/.
FY20 NIKE Inc Impact Report. (2021, novembre 14). Récupéré sur FY20_NIKE_Inc_Impact_Report2.pdf.
HP 2020 Sustainability Impact Report. (2021, october 13). Récupéré sur HP 2020 Sustainability Impact Report.
https://ar.wikipedia.org/. (2021, october 13). Récupéré sur https://ar.wikipedia.org/.
Intel, 2020 annual report. (2021, october 12). Récupéré sur https://www.intc.com/intelonline- annual-report.