EFL Teachers’ Involvement in Designing Higher Education Syllabi: Reality and Expectations Case of EFL Teachers in Setif 2 University, Algeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
The motivation underlying this research is the indisputable importance of teachers’ involvement in contributing to the development of appropriate syllabi. Given that teachers interact directly with the syllabus through implementation without being involved in the design process, is likely to create a gap between expectations and reality. This study aims to clarify the actual situation of teachers’ involvement in designing higher education syllabi in Algeria by revealing whether or not they participate in the syllabus design process, and if so, what is the nature of their participation. 18 Permanent EFL teachers at Mohamed LamineDebaghineSetif 2 university volunteered to undertake the study by answering a questionnaire with both limited-scale and open-ended questions. Findings revealed that teachers’ role in syllabus design is overlooked. Teachers are considered as mere implementers of the syllabi which come from the top. Despite this, they believe to have a voice to contribute beyond the classroom, especially that they recognize several issues in the current syllabi. Referring to teachers only at the final stages of syllabus design (i.e., implementation) may negatively impact syllabi adequacy and the overall efficacy of the educational system. Hence, the study proposed some recommendations as to make room for teachers’ voice.
Article Details
References
Androniceanu, A., & Ristea, B. (2014). Decision making process in the decentralized educational system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (149), 37–42.
Bellalem, F. (2014). Language Teachers’ Beliefs about Curriculum Innovation: Perspectives from Algeria. International Journal of Research (IJR), 1(7), 188–202.
Bolstad, R. (2004). School-based curriculum development: Principles, processes, and practices. Journal of curriculum studies, 31(1), 83–97.
Bray, M. (1999). Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, 207–232.
Carl, A. E. (2009). Teacher empowerment through curriculum development: Theory into practice (3rd ed.). South Africa: Juta and Company Ltd.
Gerber, R. (2003). International handbook on geographical education (Vol. 73). Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ghedjghoudj, S. (2012). 13. Algeria: striking a balance between tradition and modernity. In E. Thomas (Ed.), World Yearbook of Education 2002: Teacher Education-Dilemmas and Prospects (pp. 137–144). New York: Routledge.
Graves, K., & Blyth, M. D. C. (1996). Teachers as course developers. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposesA Learner-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kearsley, G., & Lynch, W. (1996). Structural issues in distance education. Journal of Education for Business, 71(4), 191–195.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). London: Sage.
Messick, R. G., & Reynolds, K. E. (1992). Middle level curriculum in action. (1st ed.). New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Nehring, J. (2009). The practice of school reform: Lessons from two centuries. New York: Suny Press.
Nunan, D., Candlin, C. N., & Widdowson, H. G. (1988). Syllabus design (Vol. 55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oliva, P. F. (2009). Developing the Curriculum (5th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Rabbini, R. (2002). An Introduction to Syllabus Design and Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(5). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Rabbini-Syllabus.html
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. West Sussex UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sabbah, S. S. (2018). English language syllabuses: Definition, types, design, and selection. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 9(2), 127–142. Retrieved from https://awej.org/images/AllIssues/Volume9/Volume9Number2June2018/9.pdf
Schwarz, G., & Alberts, J. (1998). Teacher lore and professional development for school reform (1st ed.). Westport Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey.
Sinclair, P. (2014). Basics in Education Textbook for B. Course. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
Wiles, J. (2008). Leading curriculum development. California, USA: Corwin press.
Yalden, J. (1987). Syllabus design: an overview of theoretical issues and practical implications. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 30–47.
Young, J. H. (1988). Teacher Participation in Curriculum Development: What Status Does It Have?. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(2), 109–121.